this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
36 points (87.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40775 readers
442 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's say I took a bunch of different characters from various media; a head, 2 arms, 2 legs and a torso, glued them together and then traced over to create a more homogenized image... Is that a new thing? A remix? Or ripping other's work off?

I've just had this idea for a while (wanna try making my fursona from photos of a dog for the head and my own body for the body) and got curious if this proposed technique was done using others' material would be a violation or if it would be more like a remix.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QubaXR@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's transformative. You are creating something new that did not exist before. At the very least this will fall under fair use, but your intent will dictate what it ends up being.

Ie: is I take Bugs Bunny's head and out it on Daffy Duck's body - I may be doing it as a commentary on WB cartoons, or pop culture in general. That's ok.

If I try to launch my own Looney Toons cartoon with this new hybrid character - that's stealing and WB lawyers will be all over any money I may make.

[–] HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that's stealing

It's important to note that copyright violation is never stealing or theft. That's a poetic term copyright maximalists use to morally equate two disparate concepts. Stealing and theft involves taking something that is finite and rivalrous and thus depriving the owner of it.

[–] QubaXR@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That "finite and rivalrous" is a definition that sprung up quite recently and I don't know if I agree with it. How would one "steal a kiss" if it was a finite resource. Also while stealing is not always "punishable by law", it can still be classified as wrongdoing. As an artist I find all forms of plagiarism to equate to stealing and while they won't land you behind bars, they may get you a status of persona non grata with other creatives.

[–] HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

How would one "steal a kiss" if it was a finite resource.

Stealing a kiss is another poetic use of the term.

Also while stealing is not always "punishable by law", it can still be classified as wrongdoing.

Depends on the context.

As an artist I find all forms of plagiarism to equate to stealing

As an artist, I don't. Plagiarism is about failure to cite sources and copying content while claiming it's yours. That's not even usually a legal issue. It's an academic issue. And it's not necessarily immoral either. You can be accused of plagiarizing yourself by not citing that you had previously written some of the content in a previous work. That's not even close to stealing, technically, legally, or morally.

Plagiarism is also very different from copyright violation.

and while they won't land you behind bars, they may get you a status of persona non grata with other creatives.

And it might get you fame and fortune and acclaim from others. Depends on the context.

[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I’m just curious, but what makes you think it’s a definition that “sprung up recently”?

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

From what I have gathered of the Lemmy zeitgeist, intellectual property doesn't exist except if AI uses it.