*Western AI companies are terrified

Anyway, what do you all think of the news?

Video is 8 minutes and 30 seconds long if you're interested.

Is it true that the DeepSeek models and that other AI model (I forgot the name already lol) can be run locally? How do they compete with Claude and OpenAI?

Also, what about that other AI thing, OpenClaw?

I am interested in AI but still very much skeptical.

I have only used Duck AI sometimes but try to avoid it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 months ago* (11 children)

DeepSeek V4 flash is feasiblish to run it personally. A minipc costing $3000 can do a working quantization, two such computers can run what is in practice a full model. You could even run a (weak but working) quantization of GLM5.2 in this configuration.

What you get running models this way is control over what exactly runs (you never know how aggresively quantized are models running with API, for example) and possibility of running anything that fits (e.g. models with refusals removed with methods like heretic).

What you lose is that you need to buy special hardware for thousands of dollars (which might or might not age well) and loading prompt (including the history of conversation) can be really slow compared to what bigger machines that host models for many users can achieve. Loading past context of 100,000s tokens takes actual minutes while using the same model through API will feel instant.

It shows how important is for people to own the datacenters. Running model on bigger hardware for multiple people is much more efficient than running it on personal hardware.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Interesting...

    Can you tweak or change the AI completely?

    Or even somehow notifies revamp it into your own AI completely?

    Maybe build off of it somehow and improve it maybe?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    If you mean using different models, yes. If you mean finetuning model weights... No, finetuning LLMs is hard in general and Strix Halo (device that I had in mind that costs 3K$ for 128GB of VRAM) is also kinda bad for it now due to having an AMD (and not really strong when it comes to compute power) GPU.

    In practice, people who try finetuning on top of newest models usually cripple them. There are plenty of finetunes of Qwen 3.6 on huggingface trying to distill stronger models and they are just bad.

    Heretic, the method for removing refusals I mentioned, also requires more VRAM to run it than it's required for inference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (8 replies)