▲ 375 ▼ Bane Mask (europe.pub) submitted 2 months ago by FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 108 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 19 points 2 months ago* (10 children) voice-dampening? as in, it moisturises your breath? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (1 child) It makes you sound like the voice-over of a 90's, late night commercial for a phone sex number. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 5 points 2 months ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (7 children) It makes your voice less audible. This is dampening as slowing or quieting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago* (6 children) nope, that's a star trek-ism. limiting oscillations -> damping. making something wet -> dampening. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (5 children) https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dampen verb 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago (4 children) usage notes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) The usage note pertains to usage 4, not 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) sound is not a nonphysical thing. it's a mechanical vibration. besides, we were talking specifically about the present participle "dampening" which is far less ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) And so dampening is fine Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. "dampening" has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is "damping". it doesn't dampen your voice, it damps it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (1 child) It makes you sound like the voice-over of a 90's, late night commercial for a phone sex number. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 5 points 2 months ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (7 children) It makes your voice less audible. This is dampening as slowing or quieting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago* (6 children) nope, that's a star trek-ism. limiting oscillations -> damping. making something wet -> dampening. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (5 children) https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dampen verb 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago (4 children) usage notes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) The usage note pertains to usage 4, not 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) sound is not a nonphysical thing. it's a mechanical vibration. besides, we were talking specifically about the present participle "dampening" which is far less ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) And so dampening is fine Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. "dampening" has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is "damping". it doesn't dampen your voice, it damps it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago* (6 children) nope, that's a star trek-ism. limiting oscillations -> damping. making something wet -> dampening. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (5 children) https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dampen verb 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago (4 children) usage notes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) The usage note pertains to usage 4, not 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) sound is not a nonphysical thing. it's a mechanical vibration. besides, we were talking specifically about the present participle "dampening" which is far less ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) And so dampening is fine Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. "dampening" has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is "damping". it doesn't dampen your voice, it damps it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (5 children) https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dampen verb 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago (4 children) usage notes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) The usage note pertains to usage 4, not 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) sound is not a nonphysical thing. it's a mechanical vibration. besides, we were talking specifically about the present participle "dampening" which is far less ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) And so dampening is fine Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. "dampening" has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is "damping". it doesn't dampen your voice, it damps it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago (4 children) usage notes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) The usage note pertains to usage 4, not 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) sound is not a nonphysical thing. it's a mechanical vibration. besides, we were talking specifically about the present participle "dampening" which is far less ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) And so dampening is fine Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. "dampening" has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is "damping". it doesn't dampen your voice, it damps it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 point 2 months ago (3 children) The usage note pertains to usage 4, not 3 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) sound is not a nonphysical thing. it's a mechanical vibration. besides, we were talking specifically about the present participle "dampening" which is far less ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) And so dampening is fine Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. "dampening" has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is "damping". it doesn't dampen your voice, it damps it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 2 months ago (2 children) sound is not a nonphysical thing. it's a mechanical vibration. besides, we were talking specifically about the present participle "dampening" which is far less ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) And so dampening is fine Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. "dampening" has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is "damping". it doesn't dampen your voice, it damps it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child) And so dampening is fine Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. "dampening" has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is "damping". it doesn't dampen your voice, it damps it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. "dampening" has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is "damping". it doesn't dampen your voice, it damps it. permalink fedilink source parent