754
How corporate AI adoption is going (europe.pub)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/funny@sh.itjust.works
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 months ago* (6 children)

These are not novel problems, this isn't a real source and this has nothing to do with AGI.

Literally starts with "OpenAI says" lol

If you want to learn more about what's really going on here:

https://sciencereader.com/ai-mathematics-breakthrough-hossenfelder/

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    January 2026

    Your video is ancient in this context. It does not reference any of this, actually.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Your video is ancient in this context

    You have a very hype driven view of how fast things are moving.

    https://www.ibm.com/think/news/ai-cracked-jacobian-conjecture-humans-called-play

    I'm not going to keep doing this because I honestly don't care if you want to be wrong. I've been writing these comments for other people who are going to read this thread and are interested the topic.

    You obviously are not interested in taking these kinds of things seriously so just keep posting ads if you really want.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Okay I'm sorry to say this but you literally don't know what you're talking about if you don't think that six months is a massive time frame right now. You are equating Gemini 3 to Mythos. It's not comparable. You should actually do some research into this, since you seem to be so sure of yourself, what's the harm!

    Here's an article from the smithsonian, if that helps. About the last round of AI math developments. Which was in July. So, yes, your video about something entirely different from six months ago is not actually very pertinent to the discussion?

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/ai-disproves-a-decades-old-mathematical-idea-the-biggest-conjecture-that-the-tech-has-played-a-role-in-yet-180989189/

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Okay I'm sorry to say this but you literally don't know what you're talking about if you don't think that six months is a massive time frame right now

    I know it's not because I do know what I'm talking about.

    I've been hearing tech bros like you echo this same argument since GPT3 came out.

    I promise you I'm very up to date on the state of the art.

    You are equating Gemini 3 to Mythos

    No, my original article was about GPT5.6 and you are talking about Fabel. Mythos likely doesnt even exist.

    You are (willfully?) missing the point by refusing to engage with the concept being illustrated in the article. It doesn't matter that it's not 2 days old. The point is that these are not novel problems and AI is not solving them in the way you think it is.

    The challenges here have been about the time it would take a human to solve the problem not the technical difficulty involved in solving the problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago*

    Mythos likely doesnt even exist.

    Thanks for letting me leave this conversation. Look up project glasswing. I guess all of those partners are just in on the conspiracy. Mate, you've got no fucking clue. Enjoy being swept up in the storm that is coming for all of us, blindly holding onto your moving goalposts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent