you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 181 points 2 months ago (63 children)

What we want is software that behaves predictably. Since LLMs don't do that, we don't want them or their "agents."

For fuck's sake.

  • source
  • hideshow 63 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    I actually really like the technology that has been collectively lumped together as "AI". I think it's fairly useful now, and suspect we're at the beginning of the curve for this technology, and it will only continue to improve, even as it becomes more efficient. I understand this is a wildly unpopular stance in these parts, judging by the avalanche of downvotes I get for having this opinion.

    What I don't like is feeding tons of information about myself to a giant tech company. I run a local LLM on my phone and another on my (fairly decent) computer, and sometimes I use duckduckgo's front end, which anonymizes prompts.

    As for agents, it's pretty much as you say. I just am not ready to have an LLM take action without my direct supervision, because I'm confident that between flaws in the LLM and flaws in how I give it direction, something will go sideways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago

    Yeah "AI" stuff gets a lot of hate around here but I think it works pretty well as a tool for things like information gathering and analysis. Wouldn't trust it to go off taking actions by itself either though.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (61 replies)