348
Study: Male circumcision just after birth does not increase autism risk (hub.jhu.edu)
submitted 2 months ago* by to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
188 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/science/p/1324325/study-male-circumcision-just-after-birth-does-not-increase-autism-risk

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/onion/p/1324284/study-male-circumcision-just-after-birth-does-not-increase-autism-risk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I have very very high doubt here

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Are you saying the sources are likely fake or false in some way?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    False and propaganda from the religious alt right. Also look at how close those dates are. Sounds like a paid-for "science" campaign. If there was a valid medical reason against not circumcising, I'd probably have heard about it by now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    (And yes, in individual cases, a medical circumcision is required, but not for hygiene or STD prevention, and it can never be a general guideline. The damage (loss of nerve sensation, lack of lubrication) is a much bigger problem, including for the female partner.).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent