this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
436 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

16405 readers
328 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The point being made is that a lot of that 'extraneous bulk' is actually crumple zones and structure. You can't eliminate it without losing crash protection, and that includes pedestrian crash ratings.

Exception rear trays.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I was with you until pedestrian. Lots of dead pedestrians found themselves the one doing the crumpling. And more so because it's so much harder to see them. I've had several times when it's only because I leaned way forward and back to check that I suddenly realized there's been someone walking or scooting or biking right along with my left pillar, thinking I could see them coming out into the crosswalk/intersection. (And I always back into parking places because I can see with the rear camera much better than down the front hood.)

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's a 50-50. I believe it's mostly lower hoods that improve pedestrian safety, not necessarily just shorter hoods.

European compliant cars have a bunch of requirements for pedestrian collisions, particularly trying to improve head safety - the bonnet dents downwards, rather than either the bonnet being solid or the head hitting the windscreen.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My Honda Odyssey hood curves down, but then it seems to stick out farther than I can see over the curve. This may also be a "design for a big man driver" problem because my seatbelt cuts across my throat at its lowest adjustment and the airbag will probably kill me. But we needed a vehicle that could take a passenger in a power wheelchair plus two kids.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

An extra seat cushion can help lift you up; my mum used to drive that way.

I assume your seat is fully up already?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I'm already using an extra cushion. I have the seat up and forward as much as possible with 8 inches between me and the airbag.