Hair metal band, Twisted Sister with frontman Dee Snyder

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

Current evidence says otherwise in regards to who the 'weaker' candidate is, but that doesn't mean the fearmongering won't activate enough R voters in the general to out vote the progressive's momentum.

Echelon Insights suggested that Republican-leaning voters may have helped Stevens in the Detroit metro area.

https://decisiondeskhq.substack.com/p/michigan-senate-el-sayed-stevens-rogers-primary-missouri-kansas-washington-virginia-tennessee-august

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Evidence implies there is proof and 'Echelon Insights suggested that Republican-leaning voters may have helped Stevens in the Detroit metro area' is definitely not proof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Volunteer count: Abdul had 10k people sign on to help with the campaign.

    Polls: Abdul constantly led in the polls.

    Democracy: Michigan Democrats believe he is the strongest candidate, so the majority voted for him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    None of that is proof of what you claimed was evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Ah, my bad, I misunderstood that as proof of which D candidate was stronger.

    I said current evidence of which candidate the Republicans were potentially supporting. Is that source not evidence? Is it just fake news?

    Nowhere did I say hard proof.

  • source
  • parent