42
One In Five Drivers Switches Off The Safety Tech Meant To Save Their Lives (www.carscoops.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/technology@beehaw.org
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Why? Lack of knowledge? With mine, I use it regularly on the highway outside of heavy traffic. It's very nice, actually.

Huh? Regular cruise control works just fine for that. Where adaptive shines is heavier traffic and off-highway driving. I basically use it everywhere: just set it to the speed limit and let it go.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Mine, I keep on for the most part. Theres an easy access button to turn it off when it becomes annoying though, which is only really when dealing with lanes merging.

    it is highly impractical every time some moron decides that the gap between you and the car in front of you is there waiting for him... if you are in control of your speed, you will react much more smoothly that the automatic (may depend on the car)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think Toyota's cruise control handles that situation nicely. It detects that situation (shows it on the display) and smoothly adjusts your distance and speed so you're at a safe distance for the merger. I have it turned on probably about 90% of the time when driving.

    But that the best cruise control I have experienced so far. I've used other cars that would be very slow to react and adjust the distance after the merging, and also one that would just automatically slam the brakes whenever someone merged in front of you. Both situations are not something you'd want to happen in heavy traffic, when there might be someone driving close behind you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    well my skoda detects the obstacle and brakes aggressively to increase that gap as fast as possible. if i do it manually, i see our speeds and how much of that distance i can sacrifice to make the breaking smoother, but the computer just brakes hard. it is probably better from the safety standpoint, but it is very uncomfortable - esp. if you have passengers who don't follow the traffic so they don't understand what is happening.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    By heavy traffic, I'm referring to bumper-to-bumper traffic. I've found that I can't get it to stop anywhere near the car in front of me, always preferring to leave several cars of space. Sure, it's safer that way, but it's annoying when the person behind you is laying on the horn while people constantly cut you off.

    Driving myself in those situations is generally just less stressful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Oof, bad on your car manufacturer then. My car (Kia Niro Wind) lets me adjust the following level and it adjusts the following distance based on your speed. Bumper to bumper keeps me as close as I'd be doing it normally. Only time I need to override is getting back up to speed from a stop, it doesn't accelerate quite fast enough for my taste and leaves room for people to cut in.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Mine lets me adjust follow distance as well, so I don't actually blame the car. It's just not the right feature for me when I have no idea if the car 3 lanes over is going to cut across the entire highway to take an exit at the last second. Or for when I'm zipper merging and I have the dipshit who tailgates the car merging in front of me. And so on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent