▲ 528 ▼ Teen Boys Are Using Meta Glasses to Terrorize Girls at High Schools and Middle Schools (futurism.com) submitted 1 month ago by madeindex@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 172 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (9 children) Why is the minimum age not 18? permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) Creeps exist above 18 years old too... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago Yes but starting with an age limitation is a start on these damn things. permalink fedilink source parent [+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -12 points 1 month ago (6 children) in what world is age restricting a relatively normal camera a reasonable decision? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) When it breaks laws. My area has two-party consent laws, so recording someone, whether audio or video, without their explicit consent is against the law. Children are often not held to the fullest extent of the law, and if they cannot be held responsible, then they shouldn't have access to such devices until they can be. I'm not naive to think that these devices will just go away or that the genie can go back into the bottle. But that is where regulation must act to protect people's privacy rights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 month ago (1 child) what ia the difference between this and a phone taped inside of a shirt? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago perhaps it's time to jump back to reddit. they'll tolerate your feigned stupidity over there. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (1 child) How the fuck is this a "relatively normal" camera, or ANY kind of "normal"? People like you are the reason these companies get away with shit like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 month ago because there isn't anything particularly special about it other thsn it being a mass market product permalink fedilink source parent [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago creep detected permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) Creeps exist above 18 years old too... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago Yes but starting with an age limitation is a start on these damn things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago Yes but starting with an age limitation is a start on these damn things. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -12 points 1 month ago (6 children) in what world is age restricting a relatively normal camera a reasonable decision? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) When it breaks laws. My area has two-party consent laws, so recording someone, whether audio or video, without their explicit consent is against the law. Children are often not held to the fullest extent of the law, and if they cannot be held responsible, then they shouldn't have access to such devices until they can be. I'm not naive to think that these devices will just go away or that the genie can go back into the bottle. But that is where regulation must act to protect people's privacy rights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 month ago (1 child) what ia the difference between this and a phone taped inside of a shirt? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago perhaps it's time to jump back to reddit. they'll tolerate your feigned stupidity over there. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (1 child) How the fuck is this a "relatively normal" camera, or ANY kind of "normal"? People like you are the reason these companies get away with shit like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 month ago because there isn't anything particularly special about it other thsn it being a mass market product permalink fedilink source parent [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago creep detected permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) When it breaks laws. My area has two-party consent laws, so recording someone, whether audio or video, without their explicit consent is against the law. Children are often not held to the fullest extent of the law, and if they cannot be held responsible, then they shouldn't have access to such devices until they can be. I'm not naive to think that these devices will just go away or that the genie can go back into the bottle. But that is where regulation must act to protect people's privacy rights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 month ago (1 child) what ia the difference between this and a phone taped inside of a shirt? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago perhaps it's time to jump back to reddit. they'll tolerate your feigned stupidity over there. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 month ago (1 child) what ia the difference between this and a phone taped inside of a shirt? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago perhaps it's time to jump back to reddit. they'll tolerate your feigned stupidity over there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago perhaps it's time to jump back to reddit. they'll tolerate your feigned stupidity over there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (1 child) How the fuck is this a "relatively normal" camera, or ANY kind of "normal"? People like you are the reason these companies get away with shit like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 month ago because there isn't anything particularly special about it other thsn it being a mass market product permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -6 points 1 month ago because there isn't anything particularly special about it other thsn it being a mass market product permalink fedilink source parent