▲ 741 ▼ BBC: “It shouldn’t have taken a lawsuit for Meta to implement safety measures, whistleblower says” (www.bbc.com) submitted 1 month ago by obsidian@discuss.online to c/technology@lemmy.world 58 comments fedilink hide all child comments Meta: “There’s no problem.” Also Meta after getting sued: “Here are the safety changes everyone should adopt.” 😆
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) I'm not sure what you're arguing against. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago Not everything is an argument online ;) Just pointing out that it's actually a good percentage for once. But then realising it's tiny per year, due to the way it's layed out. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fluke@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago One could argue that the fine is merely the cost of doing business given the way it's structured and what it actually costs the company. ie. That fine should arguably be significantly higher to have any substantial effect on the company's behaviour. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago Not everything is an argument online ;) Just pointing out that it's actually a good percentage for once. But then realising it's tiny per year, due to the way it's layed out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fluke@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago One could argue that the fine is merely the cost of doing business given the way it's structured and what it actually costs the company. ie. That fine should arguably be significantly higher to have any substantial effect on the company's behaviour. permalink fedilink source parent