336
OpenAI Hoarding Tens Of Thousands Of Apple Mac mini And Mac Studio Devices, As ASUS And MSI Burn Through Their Entire First Batch Of NVIDIA RTX Spark Chip And Beg For More. (wccftech.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
79 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 141 points 1 month ago (11 children)

OpenAI buying tens of thousands of Macs for AI is the funniest possible plot twist: spend years convincing everyone the cloud is the future, then discover the hottest AI infrastructure is basically a warehouse full of Mac minis. Somewhere, an IT admin is whispering: »I told you so.«

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    I’d be interested in buying one as a headless server, but a lot of the FLOSS software I’d like to run seem to prefer x86 processors.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Truly? Even with their translation layer? I forgot what's it called.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The translation later is called Rosetta 2 (Rosetta 1 having been for the PowerPC to Intel transition), and it looks like it's mostly going away next year, so buying a Mac with the intention of using it would probably be a bad idea at this point.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Which really really really sucks, because Rosetta is amazing. it’s extremely performant at running x64 code on Apple Silicon, and I’ll be sad to see it go.

    To Apple’s credit, though, they did extend its end of life a full year. Rosetta 2 Support was supposed to end this year with the release of macOS 27 Golden Gate, but due to enough backlash, they extended it to next year. (which they also did with Rosetta 1, back in the day.)

    The real thing I’m pissed about is they won’t open-source it, which Apple sometimes does (or, used to do) with its tools.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Fwiw they claim they will support it as a framework into the future, so things Linux VMs can still take advantage of it. The only thing you're losing is desktop Mac apps which have largely all converted to arm64 at this point, except games which you probably aren't going to play natively anyway

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    Well— Apple wants devs to support Apple silicon. Cyberpunk 2077, for example, did very well as a native release. But a lot of that was tied to Steam’s (and GOG’s) “works anywhere“ purchase model.

    And as far as “framework for the future“ are concerned, yeah, we’ll get there independently eventually, but nothing compares to Rosetta. It’s just fucking amazing, and it works now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    I was thinking more about things that are written for Linux and not necessarily ported to macOS. When I’ve tried things in an ARM VM there seems to be a lot less software compiled for ARM.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What exactly do you think a cloud is? It's built exactly like that, computers connected and orchestrated to run a client's arbitrary services.

    Now the interesting thing here is to choose many different types of smallscale hardware. Must be some fun to administrate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •