175
US judge ruled AI-generated child sexual abuse material is protected by First Amendment. (reason.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by to c/technology@lemmy.world
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1368970/judge-ruled-ai-generated-child-sex-abuse-material-is-protected-by-first-amendment

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Manga though? Straight to jail.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    What

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    UK, Australia, and other countries made possession of fictional pornography involving minors illegal. Manga, but more specifically doujins featuring loli characters are affected.

    Within the context of this post I'm pointing out how art made by humans is restricted, but if a big company generates the same shit they're protected.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Odd because the U.S. doesn't have this. Idk the original comment implied it did.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    In the US it's more of a state-by-state basis. Texas for example has SB20 which, while targeting AI generated child pornography, is worded in a way that would also target a manga hand-drawn in Procreate. Whether or not this was done on purpose is something you can decide for yourself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •