The title is pure clickbait, but the article is nuanced and reasonably well written, IMO.

No one wants a freaking Ubuntu chatbot on their desktop, but code submission is an entirely different issue, and I think "the submitter is entirely responsible for their code" is a very reasonable position.

And obviously, LLM-generated code policy needs to be tuned to each project and their contributor community. As an example not cited in the article, vibe-coded PRs are an ongoing plague for llama.cpp, an LLM inference engine itself, so they blanket ban them. Ironic, and perfectly reasonable. But Linus researching that Intel bug with a little help, but using his brain for the legwork and actual submission, is also reasonable.