you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 6 points 4 weeks ago* (2 children)

Dude, that expression is soooo much older than Maga. 1835 is not a year suspect of the right wing assholery of today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Doesn't make it any less worthless of an expression.

    The majority having a different opinion doesn't mean they are tyrants for going through with it.

    Are there instances where it was the case? Sure. Look at slavery.

    But the great majority of the cases it is a worthless expression made by people who can't stand they are in the minority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Nah, the expression has merit in political science, it has only recently been profaned by the US reich wing, because they like to couch their bigotry in the language of science, sociology and intellectual rigor. Because by misusing and coopting those terns, they get to redefine them in the public eye and weaken arguments against their position that rely on those terms.

    Your perception of the term "tyranny of the majority", a term originally coined to point out the conservative overreach against and suppression of minorities, is a great example of how they colonize language.

  • source
  • parent