157
Inside the $5M doomsday bunker where the ultra-rich could ride out disaster (local12.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

No. I'd rather get rid of them than make them suffer. Both would be great, but the former is the priority. The goal is to make sure they can't do more damage. Revenge doesn't accomplish anything on its own.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Sealing them in doesn't make them suffer, they signed up for a safe place to ride out the storm they caused. This is just making sure they keep really safe, so safe that they can't make the world unsafe for the rest of us again.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent