you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

The problem you describe as "temporary" implies that once your children are grown, they don't have further children that will use more resources.

A worker in a growing population can somehow support 4 children and 2 parents (6 dependents) yet supporting only 2 parents and no children (2 dependents) is a problem?

So no, it's not "temporary". It's a pyramid that eventually grows such that the foundation must crumble from the weight of everyone above.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    You are still talking about growth. I am comparing two scenarios: one where the population shrinks (and therefore gets older on average) and one where our doesn't, and remains the same average age. I am not saying we need to grow the population forever, and never have.

    I suggest you reread my comments to see where you've misunderstood, but it's up to you.

  • source
  • parent