▲ 389 ▼ A German city may soon ban smart glasses on public transport, pools (cybernews.com) submitted 1 month ago by madeindex@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] thisNotMyName@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (7 children) What exactly is stupid? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (5 children) That it's only one city that bans pervert glasses? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] saimen@feddit.org 1 point 1 month ago (4 children) Using them to film others already is illegal by general privacy laws (hasn't been tested in court yet though). This is about making it illegal to wear them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims? Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it's orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them. MPAA - make perverts afraid again ;) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 1 month ago Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims? Because someone is innocent until proven guilty maybe ? Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it’s orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them. Maybe, but this way you ban them also in situation where they could be usefull. In a way you are punishing a technology instead of the people making bad use of it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 child) This! So much This! Next Step banning Cameras and Phones. Or like some Countries already have mandatory shuter sounds permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 point 1 month ago A shuter sound does nothing now that both cameras and phones with a decent zoom permalink fedilink source parent [–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago The filming is already illegal. Small Cameras exist. Phones with massives zooms exist. Smart glasses are not the Problem. Espacially as ther probably will be a generall ban meaning smartglases without camera will be banned too permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (5 children) That it's only one city that bans pervert glasses? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] saimen@feddit.org 1 point 1 month ago (4 children) Using them to film others already is illegal by general privacy laws (hasn't been tested in court yet though). This is about making it illegal to wear them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims? Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it's orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them. MPAA - make perverts afraid again ;) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 1 month ago Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims? Because someone is innocent until proven guilty maybe ? Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it’s orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them. Maybe, but this way you ban them also in situation where they could be usefull. In a way you are punishing a technology instead of the people making bad use of it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 child) This! So much This! Next Step banning Cameras and Phones. Or like some Countries already have mandatory shuter sounds permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 point 1 month ago A shuter sound does nothing now that both cameras and phones with a decent zoom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] saimen@feddit.org 1 point 1 month ago (4 children) Using them to film others already is illegal by general privacy laws (hasn't been tested in court yet though). This is about making it illegal to wear them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims? Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it's orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them. MPAA - make perverts afraid again ;) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 1 month ago Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims? Because someone is innocent until proven guilty maybe ? Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it’s orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them. Maybe, but this way you ban them also in situation where they could be usefull. In a way you are punishing a technology instead of the people making bad use of it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 child) This! So much This! Next Step banning Cameras and Phones. Or like some Countries already have mandatory shuter sounds permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 point 1 month ago A shuter sound does nothing now that both cameras and phones with a decent zoom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims? Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it's orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them. MPAA - make perverts afraid again ;) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 1 month ago Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims? Because someone is innocent until proven guilty maybe ? Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it’s orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them. Maybe, but this way you ban them also in situation where they could be usefull. In a way you are punishing a technology instead of the people making bad use of it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 1 month ago Why would you want to put the onus of proving something illegal was done on the victims? Because someone is innocent until proven guilty maybe ? Banning pervert glasses solves the problem at the root. Plus it’s orders of magnitude more easy to prove someone wore them than proving something illegal was done with them. Maybe, but this way you ban them also in situation where they could be usefull. In a way you are punishing a technology instead of the people making bad use of it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 child) This! So much This! Next Step banning Cameras and Phones. Or like some Countries already have mandatory shuter sounds permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 point 1 month ago A shuter sound does nothing now that both cameras and phones with a decent zoom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 point 1 month ago A shuter sound does nothing now that both cameras and phones with a decent zoom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago The filming is already illegal. Small Cameras exist. Phones with massives zooms exist. Smart glasses are not the Problem. Espacially as ther probably will be a generall ban meaning smartglases without camera will be banned too permalink fedilink source parent