Technology

43,418 readers

1,856 active

74 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago

moderators

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

So what I'm reading is that they're either making a gentleman's agreement to let Chinese labs run circles around them or the easy gains are over and they're now running into a wall (europe.pub)

submitted 1 month ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Option 3: JP Morgan, Goldman, etc told them to settle down or they'll get throttled economically.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml [S] 24 points 1 month ago*

yup, that's a totally valid option if the costs for their bigger models are going through the roof

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

They must realize by now that they have no business model viable enough to repay the money they burned for the last two years, and if they are given an excuse to stop, they can tell their investors they are not responsible for the absence of any ROI.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent