▲ 24 ▼ Void Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy dispute (www.phoronix.com) submitted 2 weeks ago by cm0002@midwest.social to c/linux@programming.dev 18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) The "free" is as in speech, which is a moral stance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] terabyterex@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) ok, we are arguing english language. so yes but i was addressing the commenters implied morality on use. which is not allowed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago I did not take that implication from their post. I don't think that we are arguing semantics. They are saying that licensing code as FOSS is a moral stance, and so is refusing to use llm code generation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) ok, we are arguing english language. so yes but i was addressing the commenters implied morality on use. which is not allowed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago I did not take that implication from their post. I don't think that we are arguing semantics. They are saying that licensing code as FOSS is a moral stance, and so is refusing to use llm code generation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago I did not take that implication from their post. I don't think that we are arguing semantics. They are saying that licensing code as FOSS is a moral stance, and so is refusing to use llm code generation. permalink fedilink source parent