Take that, red bull bonces!!!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So what I would say to you is that when you say "eating large quantities of sugar is a factor [in developing diabetes]" other people, including me, say "too much sugar can lead to developing diabetes" and mean exactly the same thing.

If you want to be precise, you can qualify phrases like "can lead to" and "cause" and so on with "directly or indirectly" - but to me, without that qualification, they can mean either.

Cheers!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    So, not to beat a dead horse, but what we're saying is that eating sugar doesn't cause diabetes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    eating sugar doesn’t cause diabetes?

    I wouldn't say that, because I think there is too much room for misinterpretation. But that's not the thing I replied about and not what I really take issue with. That was, to remind you:

    Too much sugar cannot lead to diabetes

    I think that is wrong and likely to be understood as meaning "too much sugar cannot lead to diabetes even indirectly" by most people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment