you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 3 weeks ago* (4 children)

"Should"

The USA left "should" in about 1950. There is no "should" here.

Workers were abandoned by the Democrats long ago. Union membership is now less than 10% (and most of that is government employees, ironically)... it was almost 50% back in the "good old days".

There is no labor party in the USA, there is no anti-war party, there is no anti-billionaire party. There should be. But there's not.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Well, union busting prevents workers from banding coallitions and adding the unions. F-, blame Walmart and Amazon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 weeks ago

    where even is thr limit to "union busting" would the corporation striking against the employees by closing the sites where there were strikes for a few months be considered union busting despite being the same as ehat unions do to corps?

  • source
  • parent