This response doesn't make sense. It's like if I said "art shouldn't be commodified into slop," then you responded, "well, given that art commodification already exists, the question is who controls the slop industry." I'm saying LLMs and AI image generation just shouldn't exist as soon as we control them. We should just recycle the e-waste. The technology itself is based on manufacturing more consumption. I don't see why just because the technology exists we need to have a People's chatbot or AI image generator. "The technology already exists, therefore we must build a billion datacenters" is the exact same ridiculous argument used as apologia for AI companies to excuse their actions as inevitable scientific progress that cannot be resisted.