The fact that you never had the bad luck of hearing any of them doesn't mean that they don't exist. They do, particularly between tankies, the "alt-left" and the extreme radical left. Also there are some pseudo-leftoid people that don't actually know anything about leftism and all that do is just speaking pseudointellectual nonsense.

Sure he counted them to the lumpenproletariat, but do you have a text where he actually declares the lumpenproletariat enemy if the working class?

Recalling from memory he saw them as victims of capitalism who deserve better...

So he's not actually thinking they are class enemies by design. He thought its a class that shouldn't exist because the hardships they are forced to go through.

He didn't want people forced into protitution by the system, I dont think he would have something against emancipated sex workers who work in the field from a desire to do so.

If you had read marx, you'd know that those are categories that show one's relation to means of production. For instance, an artisan isn't automatically a petite bourgeois or proletariat, it depends on if they own their MOP they work with.

The few sex workers privileged/lucky enough to be relatively independent on onlyfans or other sites are petit bourgeois, those who work in countries where sex work is legalized and is essentially a day job for wage are proletarian, and those who do it illegally, likely under a pimp (who is also lumpen) and/or gangs, essentially being their asset is lumpenproletariat.

The lumpen prostitute was pretty much the only type back then, and them + other lumpens such as thieves and thugs were actually mobilized by reactionaries to coup the French government (18th Brumaire) during Marx's time, thus the analysis that, again, they could be mobilized by reaction.

If Marx gets to edit out the parts of Hegel he didn't like, then I get to do the same with Marx.