My head tells me Linux Mint, but my heart says listen to your head. Why is this hard? ๐Ÿ˜‚

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Fedora Atomic.

Updates are stable.

They can't fuck it up.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Respectfully huge disagree. Standard Fedora would be better (and is my personal recommendation) since a bunch of administrative command syntax would be different with Atomic. The internet's going to show troubleshooting advice for the former 9 times out of 10.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 1 day ago*

    You just described exactly why I would install an Atomic distribution.

    So they can't run something they don't understand, and end up nuking their install.

    The biggest differences in usage (dnf vs rpm-ostree) essentially function as a knowledge/intelligence filter to prevent fuckups.

    Everything I value is against "how long it will work without issue", "how quick is an update", and finally "how much effort do I need to help maintain it".

    Atomic systems have netted me positives on all my values. The people I know who used atomic, have only approached me due to edge cases such as specific laptop fan issues, which weren't hindered by the atomic system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 day ago

    They're both terrible choices for a beginner - constant version churn every six months confuses newcomers, some initial brokenness after every new release - Fedora would be the last distro I'd install.

  • source
  • parent