In short:

The revelation of a transfer to South Korea of two North Koreans caught fighting for Russia has sparked calls for a full apology.

Seoul has accused Ukraine of making the announcement in breach of a non-disclosure agreement regarding prisoner of war transfers.

Kyiv says it has only stated the fact of their transfer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

South Korea took North Korean POWs, without NK's consent or knowledge. Now NK can demand that SK return the soldiers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (7 children)

    Did they now?

    🤔

    And why would they do that?

    Can you do elaborate on the story a little bit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    South Korea has demanded a full explanation and apology from Ukraine, accusing it of disclosing the transfer of two North Korean prisoners of war to the country without its consent.

    Seoul also accused Kyiv of falsely denying that the two countries had agreed to keep the transfers of North Koreans caught fighting for Russia secret.

    The diplomatic spat comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told the UN General Assembly last week that his country had transferred two North Korean soldiers to South Korea after they were caught fighting for Russia.

    Seong Ghi-hong, senior presidential secretary for public relations, said in a statement on Sunday that the government was reviewing additional measures over the issue if necessary.

    Mr Seong said Ukraine had repeatedly discussed the prisoners' transfer with Seoul through various channels and had requested secrecy, arguing that public disclosure could trigger domestic criticism that Kyiv had given up an opportunity to exchange the soldiers for Ukrainian prisoners.

    He said South Korea agreed to keep the transfer confidential given security, diplomatic and humanitarian concerns, including the safety of the prisoners and their families.

    Last week's disclosure at the UN General Assembly was done without sufficient prior consultation and Ukraine subsequently denied the existence of any confidentiality agreement, he added.

    The issue had seriously damaged trust between Seoul and Kyiv, he said, adding it could harm bilateral relations.

    Ukraine's embassy in Seoul did not respond to a request for comment from Reuters.

    Alexander Hynd, a lecturer at the University of Melbourne's Asia Institute, told the ABC the incident had damaged relations between the two countries and an apology was unlikely to change that.

    "For South Korean President Lee, accepting the North Korean prisoners of war is not a diplomatic coup to be publicised at the UN, but rather complicates his attempts at better relations with North Korea," Dr Hynd said.

    "Prior to this incident, South Korean leaders were already cautious about proposals that Seoul should share air defence systems and other military equipment [with Ukraine].

    "In my view this incident makes it even less likely that the Lee administration agrees to future arms transfers." Announcement 'deeply regrettable'

    South Korean President Lee Jae Myung days earlier said Ukraine had disclosed the transfer in breach of a non-disclosure agreement.

    In a post on X, Mr Lee said both countries had agreed to keep the transfer confidential.

    "I do not know what circumstances led the Ukrainian side to disclose the matter despite the confidentiality agreement, but it is deeply regrettable," he wrote.

    "The issue of bringing North Korean prisoners to South Korea is a highly sensitive one that could have a major impact on diplomacy, security and the situation on the Korean Peninsula."

    Last week, Ukrainian presidential aide Dmytro Lytvyn said Ukraine was "an open country" and it would have been strange to hand them over in secret.

    "From the entire story, which is long and detailed, we reported only the fact itself, that they were sent to the Republic of Korea," he said.

    Ukraine captured the two North Koreans in Russia's Kursk region in January 2025, the first soldiers from the country to be captured alive since Pyongyang sent troops to help Russia in 2024.

    South Korea had previously declined to confirm the soldiers' arrival, citing concerns for their safety and that of family members still in North Korea.

    Seoul and Kyiv had been discussing a possible transfer after the two soldiers expressed a desire to go to South Korea, according to an opposition MP in Seoul.

    The transfer comes as South Korea has backed efforts to revive dialogue with North Korea, while US President Donald Trump has renewed his willingness to engage with Pyongyang.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (5 children)

    I read the article-- it's just that your comment made it sound like you knew more or had additional insight. no need to be rude

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    You asked why did South Korea accept North Korean soldiers from Ukraine. The article says the soldiers requested to go to South Korea. But WHY did SK accept? My guess is they thought they were helping the soldiers by allowing them in.

    Your previous comment asks why South Korea is so sensitive that the information leaked to North Korea. I don't want to ruin my chances of going to beautiful North Korea someday by saying something outlandish, but North Koreans can't go to South Korea because North Korea doesn't allow it. Additionally, these are soldiers who, if I had to guess, are not done serving in the North Korean army, or serving in Russia or wherever North Korea wants them to be. So now North Korea is going to open a dialogue with South Korea and demand their soldiers back. Now South Korea has to decide if they want to turn over these two men to North Korea, and if they don't this will be a diplomatic problem between two countries who are technically still at war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (2 children)

    I don’t know why you feel the need to lie about what I said, especially when anyone can just scroll back to my previous comment and see what I said

    Very clearly, I just asked you to “elaborate“. Very rudely, that is not what you did

    Why do you feel the need to lie about what I said? do you often find that compounding one lie upon another is the answer to getting called out upon your initial lie? This seems illogical to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    I said "South Korea took North Korean POWs, without NK’s consent or knowledge."

    You asked "Did they now?" and "Why would they do that?" I don't know why you asked "Did they now?" to Did SK take NK's soldiers? (This is what this article is about, you said you read the article). Maybe when you ask "why would they do that?" you were referring to when I said "Now NK can demand that SK return the soldiers."

    Anyways have a good night get some sleep

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment