this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026

270 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1,718 readers

2,638 active

522 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 9 months ago

moderators

Deceptichum@quokk.au

CobraCommander@quokk.au

Literally (europe.pub)

submitted 5 days ago by CobraCommander@quokk.au [M] to c/mop@quokk.au

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Literally

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 17 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Reducing homelessness by making it illegal isn't such a great advert for Soviets

parent

hideshow 12 child comments

[–] JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Big difference between tossing someone in prison for being homeless vs. a home/job program

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Yes, and the Soviets had the former

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 0 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Uh, no? At least not in Hungary.

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 1 point 3 days ago (3 children)

Hungary was never part of Soviet Union. And if you want to bring that up, remember where the term "tankie" originally comes from while you're at it.

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ah sure. Let's fight about whether or not Hungary was formally a member or not, when the entire point is: was the country under the (in)direct control of Moscow or not?

The answer is: yes it fucking was, dipshit.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 1 point 3 days ago (1 child)

Real mature and good faith argument you've got there. Maybe you should go back to lemmygrad where that shit actually works because you can ban everyone who disagrees.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 point 3 days ago

Never been to that instance, and I don't ban people who have a factually incorrect opinion, even if they're being an ass about semantics.

Also not a tankie, nowhere did I defend the Soviet Union.

parent

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 days ago (1 child)

No, but reducing homelessness by having rents around 6% of people's income is.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[+] biggie_dd@fedinsfw.app 3 points 4 days ago

[deleted]

parent

[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 8 points 4 days ago (1 child)

I mean, its what our governments in north america are doing instead of solving the problem.

The liberals here in Canada feel that housing is a commodity, not a right.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 4 points 4 days ago

And it's equally fucked up, yes.

parent

[+] biggie_dd@fedinsfw.app 3 points 4 days ago

[deleted]

parent