you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Justice, by definition, cannot be retributive, as retributive justice is nothing more than vengeance, bloodlust, or simple reaction.

Every incarcerated individual deserves not only humane conditions, but being treated as a human as well. In turn, that means that all justice must inherently be reformative. That does not mean that we should let violent criminals out after two months in prison, but for whatever term a person is incarcerated, the system should strive to help the person understand the error of his ways through education, and offer a hope for an alternative existence.

Violent criminals also make up a proportionally tiny amount of the prison population, and even then, many violent criminals are violent because of violent growing conditions, state violence, lack of education, and a lack of prospects. Offering education, a jobs program and training, and the ability for the individual to not feel like a rat in a cage is the very least a socialist justice system could strive to accomplish.

The death penalty further stands as the single most reactionary form of justice available. I don't care whether the judge is Chinese or American, any imposition of death by state apparati is a travesty and incompatible with socialism.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I don’t care whether the judge is Chinese or American, any imposition of death by state apparati is a travesty and incompatible with socialism.

    I would draw a distinction here. If the state's existence or authority is threatened, then the death penalty is valid, especially if it is a nascent socialist state. The preceding revolution and its survival would be more important than any one individual's right to life.

    Once a revolution has attained stability and maturity, then the death penalty couldn't be justified. And of course, no death penalty issued by a capitalist state is ever justified.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    I agree, however while the period directly following the revolution presents a number of exigent circumstances that require the death penalty, such as the execution of war criminals, state actors, and so forth, that period does not last for a particularly long time.

    I was referring more to the modern Chinese state and the continued usage of the death sentence and penalty. With the Chinese state fully consolidated and no longer facing imminent annihilation from internal or external actors, continuing to use the death penalty for criminal prosecution is an unnecessary travesty. There is nothing that the death penalty offers that simply sentencing an individual to life in prison does not offer.

  • source
  • parent