US Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson said on Friday he would resist describing AI agents as ​autonomous actors that "break loose" with "wills and desires of their own," suggesting the developers who instruct agents would be the ones liable ‌for harm.

"I'm going to continue as long as I am chairman to resist this anthropomorphizing of these tools," Ferguson said at the Reuters Momentum AI Austin event. "If someone tells a tool to do something, and the tool does it, I don't think we would say, 'Oh, what do we do about the tool?'"

Ferguson's remarks illustrated potential avenues for the Trump administration to take ​as incidents rise in which agentic AI testing resulted in unauthorized access to corporate or government data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

I just don't see it that way. If I buy a kid friendly toy that speaks. And it is advertised as saying nothing tiny children shouldn't hear. Then I press the red button, and it screams out the N word. Am I to blame? Of course not. AI are often marketed to schools and such with significant promises of what they will do. If a kid tells it to do something it isn't supposed to let them do, and it does it. Is it the kids fault? The school who bought it and let th3 kid have unsupervised access to it for 5 minutes. I don't think so.

  • source
  • parent