55
Coding is NOT solved (blog.alexewerlof.com)
submitted 4 days ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/36071801

This author trieds hard to do a pragmatic view. He does not mention ethical or ecological concerns (which should matter far more and subject to legal regulation IMO).

Instead, he focuses on the quality topic. His thinking is that companies are doing now a kind of quality arbitrage: Companies can make low-quality code at far cheaper costs, and sellthe result still at human-made prices. Which will only work for so long, he thinks: Customers will demand lower prices. (Easy to imagine a quality downward spiral.)

Which invokes the question: What has happened that people accept lower and lower quality? Is new software nowadays still really useful?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 6 points 4 days ago

Sometimes, I think the "AI" industry has an interest to keep the debate as polarized as possible. Because this keeps people from taking a sober look and examine rationally and objectively what they promise, vs. what they deliver.

We have several public debates which followed a similar pattern, such as the debates around climate protection and clean energy. (And lo and behold! Now "AI" is the reason we can't have climate protection!)

Or the "AI arms race" argument, which honestly just reminds me in the enthusiasm, propaganda, and delusion that happened at the outbreak of WWI. Yes, modern weapons got "better". But that made war just more lunatic. And now, you can kill a building full of school children with an "AI mistake". Military people must be gleeful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent