you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It was an example, there are deeper dive videos also, and links to kits to buy that bypasses the units but tells the car things are still fine. Agreed we do nerd better hacking, but then Auto companies would sue

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (3 children)

    Right to repair prevents these sorts of law suits

    But that's only for companies selling the hacking as a paid service. There is zero standing to sue a guy hacking his own car and providing the info for free on the Internet (or, eg, at defcon).

    Only thing they can do is void your warranty

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    They will claim decryption of proprietary code or something that violates Digital Rights Controls

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    People do that all the time. It's not illegal to reverse engineer something you own (at least in the US).

    It might be illegal to sell something from what you've reverse engineered

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    It's not, I take things apart and repair them all the time. Those VOID stickers mean nothing. However the DMCA is expliclit on decryption, and that would be what they'd charge people with.

    The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) makes it illegal to circumvent technical measures (e.g., encryption, copy protection) that prevent access to copyrighted materials, such as computer software or media content.

  • source
  • parent