352
Google breaks promise to provide 10 years of updates to Chromebooks (www.osnews.com)
submitted 22 hours ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 75 points 21 hours ago (11 children)

How is that a promise? It's a contract that they entered with everyone buying a Chromebook. Seems to me that breaking that would be a beach of contract, and I'd say it's probably false advertising if they continue to sell Chromebooks with "10 years of updates"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 40 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

    you are correct, if they sold them with a paper saying there will be 10 years of updates they are required to provide 10 years of updates. If not then they could be taken to court for either fraud or false advertising. Which they would likely not show up to cause that's usually their go to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

    Sounds like a massive class action suit waiting to happen.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    Which will result in a settlement equivalent to $5 to each class member. Google still is net positive, and everything continues on as normal.

    Someone already ran the numbers and it's less expensive for them to do this than to even keep a skeleton crew on support for the end of the term.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

    Companies update their agreements all the time, and we agree to them all the time, without ever reading them. When it comes to hardware, there are basically no consumer protections and companies can even legally hold your hardware hostage.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

    Your jurisdiction may vary

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    You might be more protected in theory than you are in practice.

    Whom I had in mind was actually a Noreweigan company, FutureHome, who ransomwared their own cameras.

    https://www.consumerrights.wiki/w/Futurehome_Smarthub_mandatory_subscription_fee

    This issue drew attention to consumer protection laws. Norway is not a member of the European Union, but it is part of the European Economic Area (EEA), which means EU consumer-protection directives (such as those barring unfair commercial practices) are incorporated into Norwegian law. Observers noted that retroactively charging a subscription for a product that was sold under a no-fee premise might violate these rules, though as of mid-2025 it remained unclear if any official action would be taken. Some users discussed the possibility of legal recourse or a class-action lawsuit in response to Futurehome's move.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 16 hours ago

    Good reference! For the non EUropeans it's worth mentioning that enforcement initially falls to the country itself, though subsequent appeals may be made to European courts. This depends on a ton of things.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 18 hours ago

    Yeah, I do agree your jurisdiction may vary.

    In the US at least, you can't change a terms of purchase via a terms of service.

    So if it was stated at point of purchase that your system will be getting 10 years of updates, and then they decided six years in, you know what? We're actually only going to do six years of updates, and then posted a terms of service that changed how long they were able to update it. That wouldn't be legally binding.

    In this case, though it doesn't sound like they're changing existing buyer's agreements, it sounds like they are changing the purchase agreement for new consumers who haven't purchased the product. which is far more legally enforceable as no agreement has been done in that case.

    Still a shitty thing for them to do though, considering that they had promised that Chromebooks would have 10 years of updates but I don't think they're in violation of anything since it sounds like it's only going to new consumers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent