All nations within the Anglosphere (US, UK, CA, AU & NZ) have JD imposed towards citizens. I know that the US & Canada both inherited that from Britain, which explains why they have it. However, should it be entirely only the judge making the conviction (some countries operate on a lay-judge system meaning juries aren't used, such as Finland or Japan for example) rather than leaving that decision up to jurors?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 child)

in a country where the majority of judges are elected by popular vote or placed by political agendas? nah i'd take the jury

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment