▲ 274 ▼ Social media harms democracy by spreading rumors, survey shows (www.reuters.com) submitted 1 week ago by Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club to c/technology@lemmy.world 50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (5 children) No source linked, so that's just a rumor spread by reuters. permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] meerstyler@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2026/10/01/across-the-globe-people-increasingly-say-social-media-is-harming-democracy/ Is the study they are referring to permalink fedilink source parent [–] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 6 points 1 week ago Well I didn’t vote for Reuters permalink fedilink source parent [–] yucandu@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago (2 children) News came before the internet, so they state sources, not link them, which they did in the first sentence: Oct 1 (Reuters) - A growing number of people think social media manipulates and divides people and harms democracy, Pew Research Center said on Thursday permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* Honestly, it's kind of a wild claim to be seen in 2026, when, nearly over a decade ago, Facebook was abusing this exact thing and optimizing their social media algorithms specifically to manipulate and divide people because it increased engagement. And here we are, seemingly having forgotten the past, which is barely even history at this point, and are finding ourselves surprised that the exact thing that was being built has the exact effect that it was being built to create. Even more astonishing is the number of people in this comment section either arguing against that or refuting it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago The point of a sarcastic comment like mine, is to shame reuters for their shitty behavior, that has fallen behind the times. As the other commenter has demonstrated, finding the study is easy. For everyone, including reuters. The reason they don't link them is cultural, they are so arrogant to believe they don't have to. Which pisses me off and sarcasm and ridiculing them is the only tool available to me to maybe make them stop eventually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] meerstyler@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2026/10/01/across-the-globe-people-increasingly-say-social-media-is-harming-democracy/ Is the study they are referring to permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 6 points 1 week ago Well I didn’t vote for Reuters permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago (2 children) News came before the internet, so they state sources, not link them, which they did in the first sentence: Oct 1 (Reuters) - A growing number of people think social media manipulates and divides people and harms democracy, Pew Research Center said on Thursday permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* Honestly, it's kind of a wild claim to be seen in 2026, when, nearly over a decade ago, Facebook was abusing this exact thing and optimizing their social media algorithms specifically to manipulate and divide people because it increased engagement. And here we are, seemingly having forgotten the past, which is barely even history at this point, and are finding ourselves surprised that the exact thing that was being built has the exact effect that it was being built to create. Even more astonishing is the number of people in this comment section either arguing against that or refuting it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago The point of a sarcastic comment like mine, is to shame reuters for their shitty behavior, that has fallen behind the times. As the other commenter has demonstrated, finding the study is easy. For everyone, including reuters. The reason they don't link them is cultural, they are so arrogant to believe they don't have to. Which pisses me off and sarcasm and ridiculing them is the only tool available to me to maybe make them stop eventually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* Honestly, it's kind of a wild claim to be seen in 2026, when, nearly over a decade ago, Facebook was abusing this exact thing and optimizing their social media algorithms specifically to manipulate and divide people because it increased engagement. And here we are, seemingly having forgotten the past, which is barely even history at this point, and are finding ourselves surprised that the exact thing that was being built has the exact effect that it was being built to create. Even more astonishing is the number of people in this comment section either arguing against that or refuting it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago The point of a sarcastic comment like mine, is to shame reuters for their shitty behavior, that has fallen behind the times. As the other commenter has demonstrated, finding the study is easy. For everyone, including reuters. The reason they don't link them is cultural, they are so arrogant to believe they don't have to. Which pisses me off and sarcasm and ridiculing them is the only tool available to me to maybe make them stop eventually. permalink fedilink source parent