274
Social media harms democracy by spreading rumors, survey shows (www.reuters.com)
submitted 6 days ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 6 days ago (11 children)

They also spread the truth as well even when government and media have conspired to obscure it. Social media has led to people beating companies, governments and politicians simply by providing an avenue to share reality. Social media defends democracy and protects democracy. There has always been an enormous power balance issues between the elites and the peasants and social media for the first time is allowing the peasants to speak to each other rather than the only voice being the elites through their media platforms.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 6 days ago (7 children)

    My guy... Social media ARE the elites media platforms you Dingus.

    They aren't letting people do shit, they are all censored and monitored to ensure we stay fractured and disengaged

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago (5 children)

    He seems stuck at what social media was in 2012 and hasn't realized how they are now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Yet in principle the social benefit described (amplifying voices of the unheard) isn’t entirely out of reach for social media as a category, especially if we can escape the era of closed platforms. Open alternatives are still relatively new. There is a plausible future in which closed platforms are left behind and we become much more capable of keeping mass public manipulation in check.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago

    for the first time is allowing the peasants to speak to each other rather

    That's what the tavern was for...

    You know, the place where the elites couldn't manipulate the topics of conversation and shared sentiment by adjusting algorithms and shadowbanning ideas they don't like...

    Your main point might hold if people were mostly using fediverse platforms, but such is not the case

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent