423
Microsoft is using wetlands and native gardens to 'camouflage' 20-plus data center sites by blending them into nature — critics blast the 'biomimicry' effort as 'lipstick on a pig' amid a 20-year gas… (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 4 days ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Full title: Microsoft is using wetlands and native gardens to 'camouflage' 20-plus data center sites by blending them into nature — critics blast the 'biomimicry' effort as 'lipstick on a pig' amid a 20-year gas power deal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 4 days ago (8 children)

They will generate huge amounts of heat, both from the generation of the power they will use and from their actual running.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [+] -29 points 4 days ago (7 children)

    Yes. But that's going to create winds and convection, not pollution. Less so if cooled evaporatively or using said wetland as a heat sink(unlikely). They might even be good for the water table.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    They might even be good for the water table.

    What. Half the hue and cry is because they're a huge waste of water unnecessarily because economics.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    The renaturation might be really good. I don't know how the site looked before.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago (2 children)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Yeah, but this article describes Microsoft exactly not doing that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    Let's quote the article, shall we?

    The goal is to "minimize the visual impact on communities near our data centers." Not to actually be sustainable, but to look less offensive to the casual observer.

    "I cannot really see any level of biomimicry investment that makes a gas plant a desirable neighbor." Me neither.

    "Emissions have risen by Microsoft’s own accounting, too." It is pollution.

    "Microsoft had no clear answer when questioned if it would ever change its mind on a site." They are raping the planet we live on. Please think.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent