14
CVS class action. (piefed.social)
submitted 5 days ago by to c/actually_infuriating@lemmy.world
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So these class actions generally are over digital break ins and are rediculously common. Amounts are low. This one says as much at $10 but to get it you need:

To qualify for the Cash Payment up to Ten U.S. Dollars ($10.00) you must provide proof of membership in the Settlement Class, with your Claim Form submission. Examples of reasonable documentation to show proof of membership in the Settlement Class include your browser search history, screenshots showing dates, and email receipts of online purchases within the applicable time frame. Depending on the number of Valid Claims filed, the Cash Payment amounts may be reduced on a proportionate basis. You may be responsible for any applicable taxes on your Cash Payment.

Then if you go through that rigamoral it asks how you want your payment and it lists give me your bank account number or use venmo or paypal and you have to really look for this little tiny note. I mean we are talking like a font size of 3 or something. Barely legible and the other options are not only big but come with large logo pictures.

Anway this appears to be an enshitification of this kind of thing. I think they are hoping no one will do it and maybe they can set a precedence that no one asks for a check.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 5 days ago (1 child)

FRCP Rule 23 really needs to be reformed. The reality is there likely shouldn't be a certified class in may of these cases, if the rule or the case law were followed. Instead, courts are approving dubious settlement classes, with limited resources to review anything, and consumers are getting minimal recovery.

That said, most of the time, the damages any individual consumer experiences is relatively low. Like in the above settlement, baring actual identity theft, you likely would never be able to prove actual damages to get something more than nominal damages. So you'd likely only ever be entitled to $10 in damages if you sued.

What you should be entitled to, and what should be available but isn't, is penalties. I'd be interested to see if folks ever had a desire to expand qui tam (private parties suing on behalf of the government) to expand penalties payments out of these companies, rather than doing these BS class cases.

On top of that, class administrators are absolutely a problem: https://www.vitallaw.com/news/antitrust-news-class-action-administrators-and-banks-named-in-suit-alleging-secret-kickback-scheme-that-suppressed-settlement-payouts/ald01e2f28b76305245e097ac15f43a74e28f

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago

    The part I passionately despise is the manufactured-consent opt-out angle: You have to choose not to be a class member through fucking snail mail (at least per every administrator I’ve seen), and if you don’t take time out of your day to write and mail an enveloped letter, the court assumes you acquiesce to someone else representing your interests by default.

    No rational person is gonna do that every time in exchange for the simple reward of maintaining their own right to action.

    Legitimacy (or even a facade of it) isn’t something the American legal system seems to care about anymore. Everything else you mentioned is just a bukkakefest of jizz-flavored icing on the cake forced down the public’s throat.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent