you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 5 days ago* (4 children)

That argument falls flat to me simply because there are 13 zodiac signs, not 12, and ancient (and modern) astrologers simply ignore the 13th one (Ophiuchus) for convenience.

If you are going to claim the stars have influence over our personalities, at least be consistent with how you “read” said stars.

Not to mention, there is zero evidence that astrology works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago

    Also, at the time most of the zodiac and star chart arrangements were plotted out, the Earth had an entirely different north star than it does now. So your modern star sign would not even be consistent with the ancient charts and star signs, yet somehow all the same definitions and assumptions are supposed to apply.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    I can appreciate that view point as long as we are in agreement that there is no real science behind it. I can totally see how people use “I’m such a Pisces” to describe themselves as sensitive and emotional. I just wish they would say “I’m sensitive and emotional” instead, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment