you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 82 points 1 day ago (17 children)

So there are some benefits to the ram crisis? People actually optimize things because of limited resources.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 day ago

    When I was in computer science in college back in the 1900s, they told us that the USSR was responsible for some of the best algorithms still in use at the time (both for RAM and CPU usage) because they just had less to work with.

    Guess we're all in that boat now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    You know it's getting weird out there when Meta seems to be doing something that's actually useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    Whenever big tech companies like Meta do useful things like support Overture Maps Foundation (which is also supported by Microsoft and Amazon) they are doing it to blunt some competitive advantage another tech company has, such as google in this case. They support open source insofar as they can't monetize whatever they are open sourcing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Does it count as optimization? For supported hardware, it's certainly cool. But it's not making inefficient software better, it's making better use of the hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    So using the back of a knife to cut something is not more efficient than using the sharp side? I would say making better use of hardware is also an efficiency gain. You use the same hardware to do more, while not driving up cost significantly. That is efficiency in my book.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (3 children)

    It's not using the same hardware, this seems to use a special compression chip.

    To me this feels more like the benefits of a CPU or GPU upgrade. Things run faster, but not due to software improvements. When people talk about things getting optimized due to the high RAM prices, I think most people are referring to software improvements.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 16 hours ago (2 children)

    There is no mention of any extra hardware here though. The article even suggests this to benefit existing hardware like the steam deck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago (1 child)

    In another comment, I posted a link to the CRAM presentation that mentioned a chip.

    This article also mentions some hardware:

    Because CRAM is stored in RAM and treated as RAM, with full cacheline/byte access, it can be accessed in a read-only fashion with little delay; just the cost of hardware-offloaded compression.

    I don't think it would say that if they meant the CPU was doing the compression.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago

    Ah I see. It might not be a requirement though. In the case that the numbers are given with hardware offloaded compression it might just be slower when running on CPU. But I guess time will tell.

  • source
  • parent