The research community is in uproar after OpenAI released a trove of more than 700 mathematical preprints entirely generated by AI on 6 October. The San Francisco, California-based maker of ChatGPT posted the preprints on the software repository Github.

Although some mathematicians celebrated the solution of longstanding problems, others took to social media to complain about being scooped. Some were incensed at what one physicist called a ‘slopocalypse’, even if the mathematical content could end up being formally correct.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I don't know what you're trying to say, and I feel like you don't either.

This means people will stop sharing work and insights with each other, which has never before been the case.

That part was clearly, but obviously false on multiple levels

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
  • [+] -8 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    I’m actually paraphrasing Terence Tao

    That doesn't even mean you're saying the same thing bud...

    Non-mathematicians don’t realize this, but proofs aren’t intrinsically valuable outside of what they mean about the community capable of creating them.

    Do you think "non-mathematicians" think solving a math problem magically gets someone a check? Like, if anythi g you have it backwards

    You're way off on everything though.

    You should paraphrase less, wait till after you understand what you're reading.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment