▲ 47 ▼ OpenAI withdraws 3 preprints a day after releasing 722 manuscripts on unsolved math problems (retractionwatch.com) submitted 3 days ago by beep@piefed.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 16 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1453470/openai-withdraws-3-math-papers-after-a-sign-error-breaks-linked-arguments
[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 1 point 3 days ago (4 children) Am I having a stroke or am I OOTL on “th”? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] derek@infosec.pub 8 points 3 days ago* (2 children) They are laboring under the delusion that modified spelling stymies the use of their writing as LLM training data. It doesn't. But it does garner attention (which is, I suspect, the real reason for their behavior). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] __siru__@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) Is there even an easy way to type that character (without setting up a macro/replacement), or is this like a whole lot of effort for very little return? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] derek@infosec.pub 1 point 3 days ago Your guess is as good as mine. I can imagine low-effort workflows. They would still require set up / config. The functional return, as I understand it, is nil. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago it's thorn guy! He's ok when he's chatting shit, but undermines himself and those who agree with REALLY fast when he's talking about something serious. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] derek@infosec.pub 8 points 3 days ago* (2 children) They are laboring under the delusion that modified spelling stymies the use of their writing as LLM training data. It doesn't. But it does garner attention (which is, I suspect, the real reason for their behavior). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] __siru__@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) Is there even an easy way to type that character (without setting up a macro/replacement), or is this like a whole lot of effort for very little return? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] derek@infosec.pub 1 point 3 days ago Your guess is as good as mine. I can imagine low-effort workflows. They would still require set up / config. The functional return, as I understand it, is nil. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] __siru__@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) Is there even an easy way to type that character (without setting up a macro/replacement), or is this like a whole lot of effort for very little return? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] derek@infosec.pub 1 point 3 days ago Your guess is as good as mine. I can imagine low-effort workflows. They would still require set up / config. The functional return, as I understand it, is nil. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] derek@infosec.pub 1 point 3 days ago Your guess is as good as mine. I can imagine low-effort workflows. They would still require set up / config. The functional return, as I understand it, is nil. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago it's thorn guy! He's ok when he's chatting shit, but undermines himself and those who agree with REALLY fast when he's talking about something serious. permalink fedilink source parent