you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Lower population is generally better for almost all sectors.

But lowering the population means killing people or restricting birthing rights.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    Well no. That’s a wildly incorrect take.

    Birth rates are already decreasing and are below replacement rate in many places already. Fertility rates are at an all time low. They naturally decrease as income and quality of life increases.

    The global fertility rate is 2.2 births per woman. Which is just barely above replacement. In most developed nations, that rate is down in the 1.6 range, well below replacement.

    Total Human population is excepted to peak within 50 years and then begun naturally declining, but many countries are already there. China has seen several consecutive years of population decline. India is seeing a leveling off of population growth and will soon decline. The US is increasing solely off of immigration. Japan has a decreasing population. Same with Korea. 8 EU countries have seen population declines over the last 20 years.

    If you wanted to see population decline in the US specifically, banning immigration would do it and we’d see a decline in the next census.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago

    People can also just stop breeding. Seems to be happening in a lot of developed countries. Might be slower but I bet the population will level off eventually. Or plummet dramatically from climate change/right wing political policies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    The same people having the same offspring, but later, would lower the population.

    So long as people die like regular you can stuff all those dreadful fantasies. Unfortunately, malice is not required for this number to go down.

  • source
  • parent