PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,661 readers

5,036 active

629 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

The people have spoken: Motion blur is the worst (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 week ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

162 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just a little amusing and not that surprising.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

Per-object motion blur is great but it’s a lot more expensive than a screen-space postprocessing effect.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Not really if you render out motion vectors. If you want it to be 100% correct then yes, but usually attenuating the screen-space effect with motion vector magnitude is enough

permalink

fedilink

source

parent