EU - Germany

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

This looks entirely identical to freetube

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Maybe it looks identical on the surface but seems like you haven't actually compared it by using it or looking at the features list on the site. I wanted to move away from using YouTube in the browser but wasn't satisfied with FreeTube as it missed a lot of power-user features I have previously used extensions and userscripts for. To one of my feature-requests (channel-specific playback speed) they just said it's "too niche" (as they do with a lot of them) what brought me to starting the project.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    But it isn't based on Invideous, which fails too often to load the Video, because YT actively block it. This client use another system and apart I put the SMplayer as extern Player.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    You can read the technical data in the homepage or in Github, AFAIK an forked YT API (Local API), you can also use the Invidious API, like FreeTube, if you want in the provider settings.

  • source
  • parent