My issue is the license part. If I can't own the installer files then it really doesn't seem right anyways.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

The forum post you linked to says "has been accused" rather than "has used". It also leads to a dead link, and the page is not in the internet archive.

Wikipedia doesn't mention it, so there's no source there either.


/edit: I found some sources; 2017, settled behind closed doors, probably with a commercial license after they wrongfully used the personal license in Denuvo and initially refused to settle

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    There were quite a few news articles back then. Not to mention Denuvo probably pressured to have them removed, what do you expect an event happened in 2017 to have articles survived, when this event is not something you can find in mainstream media?

    If you really want to verify, the best bet I can think of, is to ask people in r/crackwatch or cs.rin.ru.

  • source
  • parent