this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycling

2710 readers
3 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

England and Wales.

Saved you a click. Put this in the title.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That’s fine, but do it for cars first.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The amendments tabled on Thursday will bring the offence of death by dangerous cycling in line with motoring laws, the Department for Transport says.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So, drivers who kill pedestrians currently get life in prison? I've never heard of this happening.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Me neither. I suppose the main point is that the maximum sentence of two years is no longer applicable. Personally I think it may be justified in some cases with larger e-bikes. I've seen people doing maybe 40 or 50 k on shared pedestrian paths with their bicycles that are basically electric motorcycles with pedals. If a kid stepped out in front of them I wouldn't want to see what happens. An adult might get their leg broken, or even killed if they fall in a certain way. Not to mention the risk of permanent damage...

I doubt this law will be maximally applied to cyclists on regular bicycles, not enough weight and speed. Put them on the heaviest, fastest e-bike though, and the equation comes out different.

I was going to say.... meanwhile, car driver kills a motorcyclist and all they have to do is utter the phrase "I didn't see him". Big oopsie!

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 1 month ago

Cyclists are punished more severely than motorists because cyclists killing pedestrians is a violation of established hierarchy, whereas motorists doing the same is a reinforcement of it.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Of course, Conservatives would dream this nonsense up.

just 0.6 per cent of pedestrian fatalities involve a collision with a bike.

Typical Conservative strategy: Focus on a non-issue, and make it seem so outrageously important, that people can't help but be outraged.

The UK Government reports 9 pedestrian fatalities involving cyclists... from 2018 to 2022. During the same period, there were over 1600 deaths caused by drivers of motorcycles, cars, buses, or trucks.

And for some balance, this pedestrian only got three years for killing a cyclist.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, sure, I guess? If you manage to kill someone on a bicycle then you did something extremely wrong.

But obviously this is just bait to take the conversation away from the much bigger car fatalities.