this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
634 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

21032 readers
855 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Press photographers were reportedly barred from Pentagon press briefings after Pete Hegseth‘s staff became irked over unflattering photos of the defense secretary. The office of the notoriously vain Cabinet member — a former Fox News host who had a hair and makeup studio built in the Pentagon shortly after being confirmed — should probably have more important things on his mind, chiefly the war in Iran, and, perhaps, the elementary school there that the United States appears to have bombed.

According to a Wednesday report from The Washington Post, press pool photographers were banned from briefings on March 4 and March 10 after taking and publishing what sources described as “unflattering” images of Hegseth. The Post noted that the White House had declined to comment on the decision to exclude the photographers. The White House took exception, with Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly sharing an email reply to the publication with an off-topic quip over the newspaper’s recent layoff of more than 300 journalists, but no actual response to the Post’s question about the concern over Hegseth’s image.

The National Press Club responded on Wednesday, with President Mark Schoeff Jr. writing that the Pentagon’s decision “is deeply troubling and runs counter to the fundamental principles of transparency in a democratic society,” adding that “when the government decides which images the public is allowed to see, transparency is replaced by control.” PEN America also responded, calling the decision to bar photographers a “petty act of retaliation.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 122 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] giantripdrop@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] hancock@retrolemmy.com 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cmon man, dont insult my boy harvey like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I see where you're going here but at least Dent had a good side to start with.

A pocket square without a tie? At least he buttoned his jacket while standing.

[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 points 2 weeks ago

Quit lookin so dumb than

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 64 points 2 weeks ago

What a loser.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 62 points 2 weeks ago

OK, but why male models?

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 2 weeks ago

Surely this is a fast track way of getting people to only take unflattering photos of you

Oh this is definitely getting Streisand Effected.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 weeks ago

Every person on the internet that dislikes this guy should go back through past video footage and find frames that are completely unflattering and screenshot them, inundating the internet with more unflattering images.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The weird thing is they weren’t even bad pictures of him. Like, he looks like a douchebag who would use terms like ‘warfighter’ instead of just saying soldier, but the photos were just him. It’s not like the Vanity Fair photos that purposefully focused on the lip injection wounds, etc.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not about the pictures. I honestly think this is just an excuse to get rid of journalists, and a method for hammering home the point that "journalists bad. news fake." I'm not even sure he's actually seen the pictures I question.

With that said, I wouldn't put it past him to actually be so vain that it is really about the pictures. However I think it's more likely that he would have done something like this anyway, and just picked an excuse.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think it’s a form of loyalty test for them for sure, but also I really do think it comes it down to him being that vain. One of the first things he did after confirmation was have a makeup studio installed. Guarantee an hour or more of his day is spent in front of a mirror, every day.

Armchair psychologist: Things aren’t going as planned in Iran, and he feels like he looks like a fool for it, so he’s lashing out and attacking the media for making him look bad.

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Guarantee an hour or more of his day is spent in front of a mirror, every day.

Not surprising, considering his previous job was a talking head on Fox or something like that. Which, in what's left of Trump's mind, makes him totally qualified to be the Secretary of Defense.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For somebody acting as violently masculine as possible he sure is a pussy-ass bitch.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

You may not like it, but this is what peak (toxic) male performance looks like.

I'm reminded of another observation I read online, some time ago. To paraphrase:

The biggest lie put forward by toxic masculinity is that anger is not an emotion.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

So is literally everyone who makes gender their personality.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Streisand Effect is going to hit him like a bus.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

It'd be nicer if a bus hit him like a bus.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Boy, actually. At least thats his maturity level

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

This is how you get the worst pictures of yourself published ad nauseam.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)

Don't be a drag just be a queen.

[–] Jaybird@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

What a snowflake.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

There's flattering photos of him?

More seriously, what photos is he even objecting to?

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 12 points 2 weeks ago

They should go back and pick even worse shots to update the stories with, make them bigger and add ugly photos where none were before

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Dude looks like a twink fratboys bleached asshole.

[–] homes@piefed.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He’s nowhere near that pretty

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 2 weeks ago

Then why don't I want to stick my dick in him? 🤔

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wouldn't want photos of me when I'm on a 3 day bender either

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

3 day benders would be rookie numbers. He’s not gone off a bender since he got the job.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 weeks ago

His skin would clear up if he stopped drinking.

[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

To be fair, this picture was on the front page here for 3 or 4 days and was clearly chosen in bad faith by the outlet because Nazi.

Not saying I don't want him to walk in front of a moving bus, but everyone knows for a fact at this point that this administration will weaponize anything they can. The Irish Star should know better, but a Nazi salute that wasn't gets clicks so here we are.

[–] Ibisalt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Fascists being fascists, pictured as fascists. It isn’t a bad picture if it tells the story right. But I see your point. I’m just not sure if it’s right to give in and be nice just because the far right likes to control the narrative. We should call their bullshit for what it is.

Edit: Someone was a jerk about writing errors, so i tried to fix them. Thank you fellow human for calling me out. I am a better person now and the world got a little bit brighter.

[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

You might have a point. Personally I go out of my way to make sure that people think I'm arguing in good faith. I think the absolute worst thing is to give someone, especially someone who is one the fence, any reason to think I'm just like the people he's moving away from. Some of them have been told that everything not originating from Trump-approved media is Fake News, and this picture of Hegseth is definitely fake news.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

He wouldn't look like such a clown if he didn't put that grease on his hair like some kind of aspiring guido.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

I wanna see ugly photos and photoshops of him trending like we did with JD Vance.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

That is exactly where the mind of brilliant commanders need to be in times of war.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

I see a lot of potential here for the internet to have fun with

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Is it worth chiming in that I've personally never seen any image or facsimile of that thing that is in any way, shape, or form flattering to the subject matter? If I was making a catalogue of "shammies one would wash one's car with" its complexion might make an appearance in the appendix but otherwise nah. No redeeming value from a photographic stance, or, frankly, from any other point of view really.

He's not much good to humanity alive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone in the trump administration has huge ego problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] webp@mander.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago

His face unflatters itself.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Or else the man child cries.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This photos aren’t relevant, only photos I care about the EPSTEIN photos!

load more comments
view more: next ›