this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
300 points (99.7% liked)

politics

28934 readers
2035 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The biggest loser you've ever seen, trust me

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 70 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Since WWII, we’ve been on a losing streak that would make the NY Jets blush. It couldn’t possibly be because we keep sticking our noses into places we fucking shouldn’t.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

us military is not designed to win wars, or for tactical superiority. it's specialized to funnel public funds into military industrial complex shareholders. and it's the best in the world at that

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago

Fucking hell, this is the most accurate statement I have ever read about the US military. I mean, I hate everything about it, but it’s 100 percent true.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Beginning the war was already a losing move.

[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Most unpopular war since WWII, and in that conflict we had a global economic and moral imperative to fight and win.

This dumb pedophile let Israel start a war with no casus belli we've already lost the information campaign. We're super fucked. Do we think China is just going to rollover on a military ally that ships 50% of their LNG and petrochemicals? Get ready folks I think all bets are already off.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Generally speaking, the United States, since its founding, doesn't do too well in warfare unless they are part of a huge international coalition with A LOT of support from the rest of the world. They've won a few wars on their own but not many.

It's just a myth perpetrated by their entertainment industry that Americans are unparalleled war fighters and always win. It's actually kinda like the Spartans.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The worst part of it all is the stupidest part. He’s says the US has destroyed 100% of Irans military and yet it still exists. He could have said 99% or ANYTHING else but you can’t destroy 100% of something and still claim it’s not fully destroyed.

I'm confused he didn't say they destroyed 100, maybe 200 or even 1000% of it. Tremendous success, very beautiful. Maybe even 1500%.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Put a preteen girl named "Math" in front of Trump and I doubt he'd even go near her.

[–] GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I hate Trump like everyone else but America looses wars all the time.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

We should really tighten that up

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 11 points 2 days ago

but America looses wars all the time.

Also true.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With Trump and Hegseth in charge acting like impotent bullies, the Iranian propaganda lines write themselves.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're making the world root for the current Iranian regime which is wild.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

They're making Americans root for the current Iranian regime which would be inconceivable in most other circumstances. Seriously I'm pretty sure Vietnam was more popular at its end than this.

[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Imperialist USA and bastard zionists

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

Lose how? It's not they'll ever conquer him, back in America, and he'll never surrender on his own. He will spend 10x more lives and money than it requires to keep saving face, to eventually be driven from office, so the next guy can see reason, and end it.

But even if that happens, the damage is already done. Iran's new Supreme Leader got the job when a bomb killed not only his father, but also his mother, wife, and daughter. What are the chances that he will negotiate in good faith vs swear to spend the rest of his life getting revenge?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump is fucking up a war the MIC have been planning meticulously for like 50 years, lol.

https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/06_iran_strategy.pdf

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

None of the policy options toward Iran have a high likelihood of succeeding, even as their proponents would define success

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Again? Which wars has America won in recent memory? Even WWII was because Russia (spit! boo!) helped.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago

The allies won

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but the USA entering is what turned it around. Remember America stayed out of WW2 until they were bombed by japan. Due to their geographic location, they stayed out until they were attacked. There was no moral entry to the war.

[–] Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but the USA entering is what turned it around

The turnaround was the Soviet victory at Stalingrad

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, but they didn't enter out of a sense of duty or morals is my point. It is the most significant event of the last century and they opted to stay out of it until it affected them ..it goes against the narrative of the USA being a defendor of the world order and a moral authority.

Stalingrad was less about Russia, more about Hitlers hubris and general winter. Similar to what the USA is finding out now. Some terrains and territory is harder to attack successfully.

[–] Wrrzag@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

they opted to stay out of it until it affected them ..it goes against the narrative of the USA being a defendor of the world order and a moral authority.

Yup, 100%

Stalingrad was less about Russia, more about Hitlers hubris and general winter

I wouldn't undervalue the Soviet peoples achievements and sacrifice. Winter affects everyone.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

Nor the sacrifice of so many dead. It’s seen, historically, as a tactical error, though.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Not even only Russia for that matter. Plenty of other Allied powers helped too.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I thought we were all so tired of the winning?

Big hunky tough guys were coming up to PEDOnald, tears streaming down their face, calling him "sir" and pleading with him to stop all the winning!