this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
175 points (94.9% liked)

Coffee

10571 readers
6 users here now

☕ - The hot beverage that powers the world!

Coffee gadgets - It's always great to learn about new gadgets. Please share your favorite hardware or full setups. It might inspire newcomers to experiment!

Local businesses - Please promote your local businesses. If you are not the owner of the business you are promoting, kindly ask the owner if it's okay. It would be great if the business has a physical store to include an exterior or interior shot.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M137@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Clicked the link, it said "you've got 10% off!" and asked for my email, sure that's fine, then asked for my phone number with this:

By providing your number and clicking the button, you agree to receive recurring auto-dialed marketing SMS (including cart reminders; AI content; artificial or prerecorded voices) and our Terms of Service (including arbitration).

Nope, fuck you.

Keep scrolling, you didn't even get to the anal probing part yet.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 39 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

"Pre-order ships in May"

An eye watering $169, but hey it's finally here.

Slightly cheaper than the $199 stupidly breakable glass Premium.

Slightly larger 12oz capacity vs 10oz Aeropress original, but smaller than the 20oz XL

[–] vext01@feddit.uk 29 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Thats silly money.

The charm of the AP is that it's cheap and you can just lob it in your camping bag.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I've never used one, is the breakable nature of the glass version a result of heat cycles or just because it'll crack if you knock it by accident?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 23 points 6 days ago (4 children)

it's breakable compared to the $20 plastic original, which is basically nuke proof.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zabadoh@ani.social 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

One of the big selling features of the original AP was its portability, i.e. you could throw it in your luggage, and durability.

The glass Premium cancelled those features and was panned for it.

I can imagine people using the inversion method, which would put the glass part teetering on top while full of hot water while brewing. That would easily tip over, shatter, and cause unhappy customers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago

Just the glass

When I was more likely to have hangovers, my French presses had the habit of choosing that time to leap off the counter and shatter. The plastic Aeropress could survive a drop in just about any kitchen scenario and well beyond.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] catalyst@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Big aeropress, glass aeropress, now metal aeropress! What’s next? Gotta diversify that product line for maximum profits!

(Disclaimer: long time plastic aeropress user here. 😊)

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

$170 (assuming USD). And their cookie prompt is broken, forcing you to accept their trackerware.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

Well now we won't have microplastics to add body to our brews.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

As much as I would like to set it on the floor and step on it for “ghettospresso,” that price is ridiculous.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Aeropress was never anything like expresso. it just makes a fast cup easily, and the best part is the way the puck pops out into the trash and there is minimal clean up and no pod waste.

[–] UnPassive@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Where's my V60 gang? We take the aeropress camping, but I like the simplicity of the V60 at home

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

having a choice between this and microplastics is what makes capitalism so great!

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Trials included three types of stainless steels and a stainless steel saucepan; cooking times of 2 to 20 hours

Thats a bit longer than I usually brew my coffee! I use a glass French press though.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The tenth cooking cycle (after 20 hours), resulted in an average of 88 μg of (nickel) Ni and 86 μg of (chromium) Cr leached per 126 g serving of tomato sauce.

#1 If you're cooking tomato sauce for 20 hours, you're doing it wrong.

Adults in the U.S. are estimated to ingest an average of 69 to 162 μg of Ni per day

The average daily intake of chromium in the US population has been estimated at 76 μg while the US FDA recommended daily intake is 120 μg Cr

#2 Even after cooking tomato sauce for 20 hours, the leached amounts were within the daily average intake or recommended daily intake for both nickel and chromium.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

Coffee isn't as acid as tomato sauce. Your source is about cooking pasta sauce, not making coffee

[–] lime@feddit.nu 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

man, the preheating you'll have to do with this...

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I was thinking about that too, but I have a stainless steel vacuum insulated french press, and I never preheat it.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

the vacuum probably does a lot there.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 10 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The APSS says it's vacuum insulated too, but we'll have to see how well it works.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No. That doesn't change the fact that the metal has a higher specific heat capacity than plastic. The vacuum only makes it so that, once it's hot, it stays hot longer. That's not really useful here as it shouldn't be staying in the aeropress for that long, where it matters. It may actually make it worse, because you'll need thicker walls, and two of them, increasing the mass that you have to heat.

However, I think the "perfect" heat to brew with is slightly below boiling, so if you just use boiling water then the heat loss is probably fine. Still though, you're paying a premium for what is functionally a downgrade.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

you’re paying a premium for what is functionally a downgrade.

This is business. Cash in on simps who believe in myths.

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This makes so much more sense than that ridiculous glass version.

I'm guessing that Aeropress has lost a ton of market share to the Oxo Rapid Brewer (which appears to be superior to the Aeropress in everyway). Aeropress is now scrambling with any and all ideas to try to recall market share.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Town@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There are better options available for under $170 USD.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 12 points 6 days ago

I am open to suggestions!

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago (13 children)

I'd love to have one of these, but I can't do it at that price. I'll just keep getting microplastics in me, I suppose..

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

AH man it's a shame I gave up coffee two years ago cuz of shitty acid reflux!

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

Getting engineered foods out of my diet fixed my reflux problems

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Now you can aeropress that acid back where it belongs!

[–] snailstone@piefed.social 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

How do I use the numbers on the outside?

[–] vext01@feddit.uk 10 points 6 days ago (3 children)

They address this in the FAQ:

The number markings are a recognizable part of the AeroPress design and, by including them on Steel, we're protecting our trademark. To help with fill guidance, the inside of the chamber includes a laser-etched mark at the 5 level that can be seen from above.

"Protecting trademark"

[–] catalyst@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Ok this is really funny. 😂

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I exclusively use the plastic aeropress (3 years or so) and although upgrading to something stainless seems like a nice upgrade I'd want to revisit best brewing methods and make that decision again before spending $150+. I don't drink coffee every week let alone every month, typically doing week long streaks before taking a break, so this is cool to see but nothing that makes me rush out and upgrade.

There seems to be some haters in the comments for the aeropress, I guess I'd like to know better alternatives for quickly brewing black coffee for one person.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

For a mug of coffee:

  • French press for steel filtered coffee
  • Aeropress for slightly faster steel filtered coffee
  • Pour over for paper filtered coffee
  • Drip for paper filtered coffee

For a shot

  • Espresso machine

For something between

  • Mocha pot

Steel filters give more mud in the bottom of the mug, paper filters less. I think the v60 pour over makes the best single or two mugs of coffee

I use a lever espresso machine at home, the v60 is for travelling, French press in the office

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

French press? Or a freestanding thingy that you put a coffee filter in with a cup underneath for a one cup drip coffee.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreeBeard@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 days ago (14 children)

Do people think that the Aeropress is the ultimate coffee maker? Because if not, why pay the premium? I have one as well and I love it for the 20€ it costs me. For 170€ you could get a decent filter machine. Do people not Google for alternatives?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (5 children)

It's all just personal preference, but yes, many people do think it's the best way to brew coffee. Some people think it gives you microplastics, but it can't be substantial. If it were substantial you'd see your aeropress wearing away. Washing after your done should keep the amount low, if it were measurable at all.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›