this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
192 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck AI

6786 readers
951 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Read an article on this, days ago! Atleast it isn't corrupted with AI anymore! Maybe im too late to note this, but happy anyways!

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 26 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Most of it is outdated, what?

[–] Allstrive@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

To southern parts of india, most details are outdated! political articles, demographics, and details about our actors! shoudl've mentioned (regionally) my mistake! thanks for stressing it

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Gonna need an explanation for "outdated"

[–] Allstrive@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

To southern parts of india, most details are outdated! political articles, demographics, and details about our actors! shoudl've mentioned (regionally) my mistake!

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Allstrive@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

check the first 2 replies, you'll understand

[–] Cytobit@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Low effort post. At least link to an news article, if not the amended rules.

Anyway, this is old news. Here's an article from March https://www.pcworld.com/article/3099863/wikipedia-just-banned-ai-written-articles.html

[–] Allstrive@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

You’re treating a quick post like it was meant to be a full brief. It wasn’t. If the standard is “no post unless it’s exhaustive,” most discussions wouldn’t exist. This was just a starting point. Think before commenting, anyways appreciate you adding context though.

[–] desiccated_event@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No need to be evaluated by your children. Facts don't matter there.

[–] Allstrive@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Comparing peer-reviewed citations to parental feelings is exactly why we need editors in the first place.

[–] desiccated_event@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Bring back local printed news.

[–] Allstrive@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

best response!